Lobster Bulletin

    In This Edition

  1. Hawaiian Relay Pound has Potential

  2. An Educational/Apprentice Program....

  3. Lobster Cut-Out Translated for World Market

  4. Shell Disease Survey Produces Preliminary Results

  5. Study Shows Trap Density Affects Catch

  6. Profile:

  7. What Will be the Economic Impact of the Gauge Increase?

  8. Artificial Bait Still a Possibility

  9. Choose Another Bulletin



Hawaiian Relay Pound has Potential

A team of eight members from the Maine Lobster Pound Association, Maine Import/Export Lobster Dealers Association, and the Lobster Institute conducted a study to determine the feasibility of establishing a cold seawater holding facility for lobsters that are shipped to Japan and other Pacific Rim nations. A relay pound could help reduce lobster mortality, which may be as high as 5% to 40% at certain times of the year.

The study led the team to contacts in Anchorage, Alaska; Seattle, Washington; Los Angeles, California; and Honolulu and Kona in Hawaii. It concluded with a trip to Hawaii where the team met with five interested companies and two government agencies. Data gathered in the study suggests that the Hawaiian Islands should be seriously considered as a potential relay pound site.

The team focused on six major areas in the study: physiological requirements of the American lobster and the Hawaiian Island environment; Hawaiian policy and regulatory climate; distant market analysis; freight transportation options; trading companies and market consortia; and new holding and shipping technology. This article will highlight a few of the conclusions.

According to the study team, market development and expansion will be the most difficult aspect of any business venture at this point. Although the team agrees that there is great potential for expanding markets in Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Thailand, it will also be difficult, costly, and time consuming. Experienced and reliable trading companies and traders with foreign national roots, personnel, and contacts will be a necessity to conduct successful and profitable business in these countries. It is also essential to promote the product through trade shows, written materials on product care and preparation, and advertising. The team concluded that in order to properly develop these markets - share the risk, raise capital, and aggressively promote the product - cooperation and coordination of several companies is required.

The study team discovered that the freight options from mainland U.S. to the Hawaiian Islands (through airports in Honolulu, Hilo, Kona and on Maui) and from the islands to distant Pacific Rim markets are without equal. Honolulu International Airport is a major air transportation hub betwen the mainland and the Pacific Rim Basin and offers more air freight options than any of the island airports. Most distant Pacific Rim markets can be reached within 8 to 16 hours from Honolulu, significantly reducing potential mortality rates.

The team estimates that with a guaranteed mortality rate of 2% or less, an additional $1.50 per pound would be added to the product at final destination. The cost of additional handling and packaging through a relay pound at Honolulu is estimated (versus straight through from Boston) at $.75 per pound. They point out that both of these figures are estimates and could move up or down depending on market conditions.

Some new business activity has already resulted from the study. One Maine corporation has established a base in Maui, a new corporation, Maine Lobster Exporters, Inc., has formed involving 12 existing Maine Corporations, and The Great Maine Lobster Company of Hawaii was created by combining an enterprise from Maine and one from Hawaii. Other collaborative efforts have led to visits to trade shows and trips to four Asian countries in April alone.

These emerging companies represent a new and aggressive attitude among the lobster marketing sector. Relay pound technology, whether it is on the west coast of mainland U.S., Hawaii, or in Europe, has introduced innovative energy, capital, and thinking into global marketing and product quality. Other new holding and shipping systems technologies are sure to follow.

Back to Beginning


An Educational/Apprentice Program for New Fishermen Considered

"A training/apprentice program will not guarantee the success of new entrants to the lobster fishery, or even give them the skills or knowledge required to survive in the industry, but it should discourage anyone not serious about entry into the fishery from completing the requirements." This is one of the conclusions of the committee set up by the Department of Marine Resources (DMR) Lobster Advisory Council to investigate the feasibility of a mandatory educational/training program and to offer suggestions on implementing it.

The group, made up of Tom Duym of the Marine Trades Center at Washington County Technical College, Bob Goode of Southern Maine Technical College, Glen Salvadore of DMR's Fisheries Technology Service, and David Dow of the Lobster Institute, attempted to come up with a program that was simple, practical, and achievable but one which would require new entrants to have significantly more knowledge of the fishery and a greater committment to obtain a commercial lobster license.

The committee recommended that the educational/training program should contain two options: the sternman apprentice program and a lobster license certification training course.

The sternman apprentice program would require anyone licensed as a sternman or working on a vessel licensed for a sternman to show proof, certified by three licensed lobstermen, of having worked one hundred paid days or more with a licensed Maine lobsterman. When this condition has been met, the applicant is qualified to sit for the exam. Short courses would be offered each winter to help prepare for the exam.

The second option, a lobster license certification training course, would be patterned after the Hunter Safety Program of the Maine State Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. The group suggested that the training program be offered at five or six coastal sites and be coordinated by the technical college system. The course would consist of six program areas which include: safety and survival; navigation rules and boat handling; biology and conservation practices; laws and regulations; fishing ethics and techniques; and marketing and product quality.

The training certification program would require about 48 to 50 hours to complete and would be flexible to meet individual needs and time constraints. At the end of the course, the instructor would certify that the applicant had participated in all aspects of the program and then he/she would be eligible for the comprehensive exam. There would also be an oral or video option for those applicants who might have a reading difficulty.

As Bill Anderson of the Lobster Advisory Council points out, "The reason we're interested in this kind of program is that if Maine doesn't do something, the federal government (Coast Guard) will. And we'd prefer to have control over it ourselves."

Back to Beginning


Lobster Cut-Out Translated for World Market

In the summer of 1989, the Lobster Institute produced a bright red brochure cut into the shape of a lobster with information about the nutritional value of lobsters as well as how to cook and eat them. During the past year, over 20,000 of these brochures have been distributed throughout New England. Now, the brochure is being translated into French, German, Japanese, and Chinese so we can share this fascinating information with lobster lovers worldwide.

The Institute is also in the process of reprinting a green lobster cut-out which will have other interesting facts about lobsters.

Back to Beginning


Shell Disease Survey Produces Preliminary Results

Rod Getchell, marine scientist at Maine Department of Marine Resources (DMR), developed a questionnaire to find out how Maine's lobster holding facilities are affected by shell disease. Supported by DMR's Lobster Seed Fund, the survey was sent out in January to 45 members of the Maine Lobster Pound Association and 125 lobster dealers. As of March 6th, 31 poundkeepers and 34 lobster dealers had responded.

Preliminary results show that:

* 21% of dealers find shell disease in 1% to 5% of their lobsters when first purchased while 10% of poundowners find the disease in 1% to 5% of their lobsters when first purchased and stored.

* 18% of dealers discover shell disease after a period of storage; 35% of poundowners discover shell disease after long-term storage.

* Dealers affected by shell disease purchase an average of 24% of their lobsters from Canada. Poundowners affected by shell disease purchase an average of 25% of their lobsters from Canada.

* Shell disease is most prevalent in winter, spring follows, and then summer.

* Dealers say lesions start to appear 3 to 4 weeks after storage. 50% of poundowners observe lesions after 4 months of storage.

* Poundowners find that most lesions occur on the upper surfaces of claws; dealers find that lesions occur most often on the upper surfaces of the body.

* 78% of affected dealers and 75% of affected poundowners cull out infected lobsters prior to storage. In both groups, those that didn't cull out infected lobsters didn't observe lesions initially.

* Most poundowners, as well as most dealers, cull at the stage where lesions are minor or moderate. Both groups also check each lobster before storage.

* 67% of dealers affected by shell disease also recheck shell quality during storage. 75% of affected poundowners recheck shell quality sometime during storage.

* 78% of dealers remove mortalities daily; 32% of poundowners remove mortalities daily while 35% pull out dead lobsters only at harvest time.

* Most dealers discard mortalities in refuse containers. Two affected dealers reported dumping morts in waters nearby.

* Most poundkeepers discard their mortalities in refuse containers. Two piled their morts on the shore.

* 83% of affected poundkeepers drag their lobsters as a harvest method while 31% of poundkeepers not affected by shell disease drag them.

In addition to the above responses, 24 questions were asked covering practical measures that can be used to prevent or control shell disease. A list of recommended control measures that are currently being practiced include the following:

1. Source: purchase from non-infected areas.

2. Inspection: examine each lobster prior to storage.

3. Density: limit overcrowding.

4. Hygiene: remove mortalities and old shells promptly.

5. Husbandry: provide adequate feed.

6. Harvest: avoid damage by harmful gear.

7. Monitor: recheck quality of exoskeletons periodically.

8. Environment: avoid rapid changes in salinity, temperature, and oxygen levels.

A final report summarizing the results of the shell disease survey will be submitted to the DMR Lobster Advisory Council in May.

Back to Beginning


Study Shows Trap Density Affects Catch

Cheryl Waltz, graduate student in Animal, Veterinary, and Aquatic Sciences has been working with other University of Maine researchers to study the relationship between the number of lobster traps per acre and the trap yield.

Researchers used both wood and wire traps baited with herring and cod heads for their experiments. 100 lobsters were placed in a 35,000 square foot lobster pound owned by Maine Coast Seafoods in Spruce Head. Traps were alternately set in groups of 4, 8, 12, and 16. They were hauled every 2 to 3 days and the catch was recorded.

Results showed that the maximum trap density to produce maximum yield was slightly less than 12 traps per acre. It is interesting to note that the yield per trap within the pound, 0.85 pounds per trap, was the same as that recorded by fishermen hauling in open water.

Back to Beginning


Profile:
Jack Merrill:
A New Breed of Lobsterman

"When I was going to high school in Boston, and they asked what my probable occupation would be so they could put it in the yearbook, as a joke I said lobsterman. But then it was so far from reality." Today, Jack Merrill is a lobsterman on Little Cranberry Island where he's been fishing for 17 years.

Jack's family has deep roots in Maine. His great grandfather was the governor of the state back around the turn of the century and his father is from Augusta. As a child, Jack always spent his summers on Little Cranberry with his family. Then, while he was attending Antioch College in Ohio, he was involved in a work study program at Outward Bound on Hurricane Island. "I woke up one morning and said 'I love the water; I want to live here.'"

Jack moved to Little Cranberry and worked as a carpenter for the first year. "I'd be up on the roof looking out on the water and all the other guys would be out fishing. So, I decided I'd try it as a sternman." Jack was a sternman for three years and then decided he'd do it on his own.

"Before I ever went out and got my own boat, I had a lot of encouragement from the people on the island to do it. After World War II, a lot of people had moved off the island. But now, there were about a dozen guys my age who were starting to lobster and it was an exciting time because everyone was getting into it together. It was a repopulation of the island."

Jack likes lobstering not only for the independent life style, but because he loves being outside and working physically. However, he points out that the weather is tough at times, especially in November and December when he catches most of his lobsters, and the physical stress is hard on his body. He also says that it's very frustrating because, even though he's an independent businessman, he doesn't have a lot of say over what he'll get for his product.

Jack and his wife Erika live in Islesford with their two children, Laura and Sam. Jack also takes friends' and neighbors' children with him out on his boat once or twice a month in the summer. "I think it's worthwhile telling kids about the value in this kind of life. It's not the norm in America anymore for an independent guy to go out on the water, to live in a good clean environment, and try to live cleanly in that environment. I think it's a valuable thing for America to hold onto."

Besides being a member of the Lobster Institute's Board of Advisors, Jack has also been on the Board of the Maine Lobstermen's Association for six years. As Jack puts it, " I'm getting involved in being a 'responsible' lobsterman which means you have to go to a lot of meetings and work with the bureaucracy which is frustrating. But, it's a way of life that's died out in most of America and I think it's worth fighting for."

Back to Beginning


What Will be the Economic Impact of the Gauge Increase?

"Conservation measures such as the gauge increase are much more acceptable if they can be accompanied by policies that lessen the economic costs of these measures," according to Jim Wilson, University of Maine economist and chairman of the Scientific and Statistical Committee of the New England Fisheries Management Council (NEFMC).

Wilson, along with economist Jon Sutinen of the University of Rhode Island, prepared a report for the Lobster Oversight Committee of the NEFMC. The report states that, although it is impossible at this time to answer the question about the economic impact of the gauge increase, there are actions which can be taken to minimize the price declines expected because of an overall increase in supply and a shift away from chicken lobsters.

By interviewing the industry, Wilson and Sutinen came up with a number of impacts that the industry attributes to the gauge. One is that there is a strong demand for one-pound "chicken" lobsters, especially in the summer tourist trade. Since this sector of the industry feels there is an upper limit on the price per meal that can be charged, if the average weight of a lobster increases, there will probably have to be some decline in price per pound in the market. It is unknown whether the decline in price will completely offset the increase in weight.

Another impact is that export trade is especially dependent on chicken lobsters. Although some feel it would be possible to sell larger lobsters, it would take an expanded marketing effort.

Canadian exporters to Europe and Japan are also in an advantaged position because of their greater supply of chickens. In addition, because the Canadian and U.S. minimum gauges differ, the Canadians are forced to rely on distribution channels that go around the traditional channels in New England. This may eventually undermine New England access to Canadian lobsters which is necessary for the maintenance of our markets.

If the "Mitchell Bill" is overturned because of the Free Trade Agreement, and reconsignment of short Canadian lobsters by U.S. dealers is not possible or too costly, Canadian exporters to the U.S. would be in an advantaged position because they would be able to offer a range of lobsters not available to U.S. dealers.

Another impact the industry attributes to the gauge is the increase in cull lobsters. Reasons given are increased handling of sub-legal lobsters in traps and the growing number of wire traps used.

Wilson and Sutinen point out that it is not clear whether the expected increases in supply (which could possibly result from the gauge increase) will offset the probable declines in price. However, it is clear that a shift in the market away from the saturated, seasonal tourist trade towards the year-round trade would relieve the downward pressure on price and improve the economic prospects from increasing the gauge.

The researchers suggest the following changes in the industry to help bring about this marketing shift:

1. The industry needs to reposition its product and distribution in a way that favors the development of up-scale, year-round markets.

2. With a stronger emphasis on the less seasonal, national and international market, the industry will need to rely more on market mechanisms that contribute to steady, seasonal supplies. Staggered Canadian/U.S. seasons and pounding are fairly successful mechanisms for stabilizing supply. However, two other standard procedures to deal with this are "product sales and inventory reporting"; and "a public exchange at either the first buyer or wholesale level."

3. There should be a thorough study of the market and the nature of consumer demand to provide the detailed information necessary for market "repositioning."

4. Finally, absolutely essential to the economic health of the industry (in both the U.S. and Canada) is the maintenance of a free flow of product in both directions across the border.

Wilson and Sutinen feel that working towards this outcome would be a healthy and constructive development for industry on both sides of the border. If the NEFMC feels these changes should be implemented, a strong cooperative relationship with Canada would be necessary. For many reasons, this does not exist at the present time. The report suggests that a delay in further increases in the gauge may be a way to establish this close working relationship.

Back to Beginning


Artificial Bait Still a Possibility

Since 1988, Ken Allen and other researchers at the University of Maine have been developing and testing artificial lobster bait. Although there have been several modifications of the original concept in the last two years, the goals of the project have remained the same: to produce a bait that will be as effective as natural bait, that can be stored for relatively long periods of time, and is inexpensive.

The first bait that was developed consisted of several amino acids bound together by Plaster of Paris. Herb Comeau, a lobsterman who fishes in South Addison, field tested the bait. Comeau fished double traps, one baited with herring and the other with the artificial bait. The 117 traps baited with herring caught 122 lobsters while the same number of traps baited with artificial bait caught 24 lobsters.

During the summer of 1989, the bait was changed to amino acids plus fish meal and the adhesive material used was an artficial polymer produced by Dupont. The field trial was conducted in the same manner as the previous year except the number of traps was reduced to a total of 100. The 50 traps baited with herring caught 48 lobsters while the 50 traps using artificial bait caught 18 lobsters.

Although the results of these tests did not show a great increase in the effectiveness of the artificial bait, it was an improvement. Analysis of the fish meal/polymer bait indicated that the polymer was not releasing the attractants at an appropriate rate. Therefore, researchers are planning to use a different polymer and increase the amount and number of amino acids in a new bait which they are currently developing with support from the Lobster Institute. Tests for the modified bait will begin this month.

Back to Beginning

The Lobster Bulletin is a periodic newsletter published by the Lobster Institute in cooperation with the Maine/New Hampshire Sea Grant Marine Advisory Program. We welcome your comments and suggestions. For more information please contact us at:
Lobster Institute
5715 Coburn Hall #22
University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5715
TEL (207) 581-1448. Editor: Susan White.



Back to the Bulletin Menu