Lobster Bulletin

    In This Edition

  1. Territoriality as a Form of Limited Entry?

  2. Pilot Project in Canada:

  3. Industry Supports Lobster Cruise

  4. Biodegradable Escape Panels Tested in New Jersey

  5. NH Researchers Study Lobster in Great Bay

  6. Lobster Tests:

  7. Shell Disease:

  8. Choose Another Bulletin



Territoriality as a Form of Limited Entry?

by James Acheson, Professor of Anthropology and Marine Studies, University of Maine and author of The Lobster Gangs of Maine

In the limited entry debate that has been going on in the lobster industry for the past twenty years, it is important to recall that the lobster industry already has a form of limited entry. As anyone connected with the industry knows, only certain people are allowed to go fishing from each harbor in Maine, and that members of these harbor "gangs" are only allowed to go fishing in the traditional territory of that harbor.

Men who attempt to set traps in other areas are usually warned in one way or another. If they refuse to stop their incursions, their traps are destroyed. Defending traditional lobstering territories in this way is illegal, but it occurs constantly. Usually, only a few traps are destroyed, but there have been occasions when lobster wars break out which result in enormous property losses and a lot of bitterness. For this reason, people are apt to think of the territorial system as destructive and even as a form of criminal activity.

There is a positive side to the system, however. In those areas where territories are defended most vigorously and where it is most difficult to join harbor gangs, the amount of fishing pressure on lobsters is reduced. Our research over the past 15 years shows that this leads to a number of favorable results: lobster catches are larger; the lobsters in those areas are slightly bigger; the catch per unit of effort is larger; and there is some evidence that the breeding stock is greater in these areas.

If the territorial system is hard on interlopers, it is beneficial for lobster fishermen who are permitted to fish in these areas. More importantly, it benefits conservation efforts and helps ensure the lobster resource. What all this suggests is that limited entry works.

How do we in Maine take advantage of this situation? One way might be to formalize the existing territorial system. Monhegan Island has long had its fishing area defended by the state, and Swan's Island has recently established a trap limit in its waters. Could this be done effectively along the rest of the coast without incurring tremendous enforcement costs?

Back to Beginning


Pilot Project in Canada:
Will Increase in Gauge Increase Yield?

Excerpted from the article A Pilot Project for Management of Lobster Stocks in Canada: Would an Increase in minimum carapace length substantially increase the yield in Canadian lobster fisheries? by Gerard Conan, A/Chief, Invertebrate Division, Canadian Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans, Moncton, N.B.

Lobsters in the Gulf of St. Lawrence have traditionally been divided into "markets" and "canners." Market lobsters have a carapace size greater than 3-3/16 inches and are intended for live sale, while canners have a carapace size between 2-1/2 and 3-3/16 inches and are sold cooked, canned, in coldpacks, or live in the local market.

The lobster fishery is regulated by minimum carapace size, prohibition to retain females with eggs, limited number of licenses, maximum number of traps, trap size, and length of fishing season. All of these regulations have helped maintain stable catches or increase them.

Theoretical "yield-per-recruit" models (which assume there is an increase in yield by one lobster for every recruit) generally indicate that it would be beneficial to increase minimal legal size in order to increase lobster yield and enhance egg production. In a yield-per-recruit model, the concept is simple. If you leave the lobster in the water longer, it will grow and reproduce. However, changing the fishery may induce other changes in the lobster population.

Data is not yet available to predict whether a greater number of lobsters, or a change in the age structure will affect lobster fertility, growth, natural mortality, and hence recruitment. We also do not know if the local environment can support more lobsters that all need shelters of sufficient size.

We do know, however, that large lobsters tend to congregate in certain areas while small ones prefer other areas. This may be a preliminary indication that the physical structure of the environment may be limiting for certain size categories. It is also likely that mortality could increase - especially during molt when adequate shelter is lacking for lobsters of a certain size.

In many areas of the Gulf of St. Lawrence, canners make up as much as 80% of the catch. The fishery is very dependent on recruitment to the canner size and, during the short fishing season, most fishable lobsters are removed. As a result, any failure in recruitment could compromise a full annual fishing season.

For our experiment, we increased the minimal legal carapace length of fishable lobsters from 2-1/2 to 2-3/4 inches in an isolated area where we had the cooperation of local fishermen. The coastline region of Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, on the Gulf of St. Lawrence side was chosen as the experimental zone.

Beginning in 1987, the minimum legal carapace size was increased by 1/16 inch per year. This will continue until the target size of 3-5/16 inches is reached in 1990. Spreading the increase over four years will offset a sudden decrease in landings, since canners make up a large proportion of the catch. In addition, the use of escape gap mechanisms on traps has been mandatory since 1987 to avoid fishery-induced mortality on short lobsters.

Short term effects of the project can already be assessed. There was a slight decrease in catch for fishermen in the pilot zone in 1987, and a slight increase in 1988. It is difficult at this time to differentiate these slight changes from previous year-to-year variability in landings, and long-term results are not yet available.

The Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans has initiated three sampling projects within the Cape Breton pilot zone to monitor the effects of the size increase. Following the 1988 lobstering season, 5000 lobsters were tagged and released along the Cape Breton coast. From those lobsters that return in future seasons, researchers will be able to analyze growth and movement during and after the carapace size increase. They have also increased at-sea sampling to assess changes in catch per unit effort and shift in size-frequency distribution, and to estimate any loss in catches by fishermen.

The situation will be monitored closely over the next several years. Results of these experimental studies could help determine whether an increase in the weight of individual lobsters actually translates into an increase in the long-term number of lobsters available to the fishery.

The results of this experiment are also expected to have a great impact in other regions of the Gulf. Fishermen are eagerly awaiting our input prior to forming their own opinion about whether they should request federal government action to increase the minimal legal size of fishable lobster in the Gulf of St. Lawrence.

(Editor's note: Fishermen in the Gulf of Maine are also eagerly awaiting the results of these studies. The pilot project in the Cape Breton area should provide objective information on the response of lobster populations to a management scheme involving an increase in legal minimum size - and that is of interest to all of us.)

Back to Beginning


Industry Supports Lobster Cruise

Why has the lobster catch remained relatively stable over the last four decades even though the number of traps has more than doubled? This has been a concern of fishermen, researchers and fisheries managers for years. A ten-day lobster research cruise planned for this summer could help solve the mystery.

Four marine researchers from the University of Maine - Bob Steneck, Dan Belknap, Les Watling, and Rick Wahle - and Lew Incze of the Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, will be invoved in the project. Leaving from Boothbay Harbor on August 3, researchers will spend two days at each of four sites in the Gulf of Maine. Sites include Head Harbor and Swan's Island in Maine; Isle of Shoals, New Hampshire; and Nahant, Massachusetts.

Maine is thought to have the highest population density of lobsters per linear distance of coastline in the world. Researchers will examine the hypothesis that bottom characteristics and sediment types are important factors in determining the population densities of American lobsters and other species that share their habitat.

The 80-foot R/V ARGO MAINE, the only U.S. deep-sea research vessel north of Cape Cod, will serve as the mother ship for the cruise. Two other small University-owned boats, the R/V Lee and the R/V Sculpin, will be used to conduct side scan sonar work (which produces a map of the ocean floor resembling an aerial photograph), collect planktonic lobster larvae and invertebrate samples, and transport divers. Lobstermen involved in the Lobster Institute have offered the use of their boats to help transport media people from the land bases out to the ARGO and research sites.

The kinds of questions which will be addressed on the cruise could have far-reaching implications for the industry. An important concern is whether the minimum size of legal lobsters should be increased to conserve the industry. Another is whether lobster hatcheries are effective in increasing lobster stocks, or are there already too many larvae in the ocean relative to the amount of suitable habitat available? The answers to these, as well as other vital questions, will be the focus of the cruise.

Back to Beginning


Biodegradable Escape Panels Tested in New Jersey

Excerpted from an article Marine Plastics: A Positive Perspective by Kim Kosko, New Jersey Marine Sciences Consortium

Plastics have proven useful in many marine-related industries, because they are versatile and practically indestructible. But durability is not always a desirable characteristic. Carelessly discarded plastic products can pollute our oceans and threaten marine life indefinitely. The New Jersey Marine Sciences Consortium, New Jersey Sea Grant, and Stevens Institute of Technology's Polymer Processing Institute are currently collaborating on projects geared toward developing plastics for the commercial fishing industry that are more efficient and environmentally sound.

The lobster trap industry has traditionally used very few synthetic materials. Traps are usually made from treated wood or wire which may last a long time in the ocean and continue to capture lobsters even after they are lost or abandoned. Lobsters trapped in lost pots may starve to death or be eaten by other lobsters. With more than 200 thousand pots lost between Maine and Delaware each year, a significant percentage of the commercially valuable lobster population could be lost in these "ghost" traps.

One project initiated by the New Jersey Marine Sciences Consortium involves introducing and using plastics in traps. Researchers are planning to replace some slats in a lobster pot with a degradable plastic so creatures caught in lost pots have a better chance for escape and survival. The project, funded by a $187,000 federal grant, involves several phases. The first one focuses on developing biodegradable materials made from off-the-shelf products for the "escape panels" and testing them in specific water temperatures and on different bottom types.

Dr. Ken Gonsalves of Stevens Polymer Institute produced specially designed biodegradable materials from commercially available polymer products, and tested them in the ocean along the eastern and gulf seaboard. Since lobstermen indicated they didn't want a product that had to be replaced more than once every three to six months, Dr. Gonsalves is looking for a plastic that would last about three months in salt water.

The second phase of the project involves developing and testing new biodegradable polymer materials which could be used for traps. This phase will involve field testing in cooperation with fishermen along the east coast.

After almost nine months on the project, Dr. Gonsalves has found that degradation (disintegration of the degradable materials) depends to a great extent on the location, and that warmer waters seem to enhance the process.

Back to Beginning


NH Researchers Study Lobster in Great Bay

Win Watson and Hunt Howell of the University of New Hampshire's Zoology Department have received a development grant from the New Hamphire Sea Grant College Program to study lobsters in the Great Bay Estuary. Ed Heaphy, a lobsterman in Great Bay, will be cooperating on the project. The Great Bay system is located where the Piscataqua River, which separates Kittery and Portsmouth, meets the Atlantic Ocean.

Although the American lobster is being studied extensively in saltwater marine environments, little is known about lobster biology and behavior in estuarine habitats. Watson and Howell's study will help determine how much lobsters use the estuary and whether they use it for breeding, as a nursery, or feeding; what their distribution is spatially and at different times throughout the year; and whether there is an estuarine population separate from the coastal population and how much they mix. They will also examine seasonal movements, territoriality and homing behavior, and how lobsters respond to changing conditions in the estuary.

An estuary is a semi-enclosed body of water where fresh water from rivers and tributaries mixes with incoming tidal salt water from the ocean. This causes wide fluctuations in the temperature and salinity of estuarine water. Therefore, lobsters living in this environment must cope with drastic and often sudden changes in both the water temperature and salinity. This is especially true in the spring when freshwater run-off and frequent storms dramatically lower the water's salinity. Watson and Howell will investigate what impact these changing conditions have on lobster populations.

The results of this sudy could have far-reaching implications for fisheries management plans. If, for example, lobsters in New England estuaries don't mix with those in coastal waters, then populations from these different areas must be managed separately. On the other hand, if there is extensive mixing, then events that occur in one area will affect the other. In addition, information on the distribution of lobsters is needed to access the impact of shoreline development, dredge and fill operations, marina development, and the leasing of areas for aquaculture.

For more information, contact Win Watson, (603) 862-1629 or Hunt Howell, (603) 862-2109.

Back to Beginning


Lobster Tests:
Simple and Effective

Red tail or gaffkemia is a serious threat to lobsters held in pounds or cars because the disease spreads rapidly and can cause high mortalities. As infected lobsters die, they release millions of bacterial cells into the water which can then infect other lobsters. Even one bacterium, entering a healthy lobster's body through the smallest break in the shell or soft tissue, can infect the lobster with the disease. Also, the warmer the water, the more quickly the bacteria will spread and the sooner it will kill its host.

Herb Hodgkins of Lobster Products in Hancock has been working with researchers at the University of Maine for the past 14 years to devise a test to detect gaffkemia in its early stages, and develop a method to control it. A medicated lobster feed containing an antibiotic resulted from this research.

Four years ago, Hodgkins started a business to help pound owners diagnose gaffkemia and determine when treatment is needed. He routinely travels to pounds in Maine and Canada with his test kit to sample lobster blood. He has also marketed the pelletized medicated diet, as well as other diets, to pound owners throughout the region.

The medicated diet contains the antibiotic Terramycin (Oxytetracycline) which has proven effective in both controlling and, in many cases, preventing or curing gaffkemia. Before lobsters can be marketed, pound owners must be sure that no antibiotic residues remain in the edible tissues of the lobster. A conventional residue test has been used to ensure that lobsters are free of antibiotics. However, this test is very time-consuming, expensive, and requires laboratory supplies that are difficult for the average lobster dealer or pound owner to obtain.

Kathleen Anderson, a student at the University of Maine, has found that a commercial test used for detecting antibiotic residues in milk from dairy cows is also effective when used with lobster blood. The Delvotest P takes only 2-1/2 hours to complete, is simple to use, and accurate. The test kit can be purchased from Gist Brocades, P.O. Box 241068, Charlotte, NC 28224. For information or a demonstration on how to use the test, contact Herb Hodgkins, (207) 422-6238.

Back to Beginning


Shell Disease:
Is it Related to Pollution?

Excerpted from an article Shell Disease Investigated in Southern New England Waters by Bruce Estrella, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries

In 1988, fishermen in the New York Bight region reported a high incidence of shell erosion and blackened lesions on lobsters and crabs in the deeper waters of the submarine canyons near the Deep Water Municipal Sludge Dump site - 06 miles from shore. Scientists had also previously reported shell disease in the vicinity of near-shore ocean waste disposal sites.

Although shell disease occurs naturally, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was concerned that the disease could be related to sludge dumping. Other concerns focused on the potential economic losses due to the unsightly appearance of the affected crustaceans, and the possible impact of unfavorable publicity on seafood markets.

The EPA established a working group of federal, state, and academic scientists from Massachusetts to North Carolina to analyze shell disease in the New York Bight and elsewhere in the northeast. The group reviewed, analyzed, and summarized published and unpublished information about the abundance and condition of lobster and crab populations, as well as the cause and extent of shell disease.

A formal report stating the working group's conclusions and recommendations for future research was prepared for the EPA by April first of this year. However, the contents of the report will not be made available until final agency approval.

Back to Beginning

The Lobster Bulletin is a periodic newsletter published by the Lobster Institute in cooperation with the Maine/New Hampshire Sea Grant Marine Advisory Program. We welcome your comments and suggestions. For more information please contact us at:
Lobster Institute
5715 Coburn Hall #22
University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5715
TEL (207) 581-1448. Editor: Susan White.



Back to the Bulletin Menu