|
In This Edition
With all the recent controversy surrounding ghost traps and biodegradable escape
panels, there still remains a question in some lobstermen's minds whether ghost
traps actually fish lobsters or just ghosts! Since the law mandating the
installation of ghost panels in all traps has been delayed until January 1, 1990,
researchers at the University of Maine in Orono are planning to use these two
years to find out whether ghost traps really do, in fact, pose a problem for the
industry and, if so, how serious it is.
Dr. Robert Bayer, professor of Animal and Veterinary Sciences at UM, along
with graduate student George Kupelian and fishermen from Isleford, is designing
an experiment to find out just what happens in the watery depths from a lobster's
point of view. By installing a time lapse video camera near a series of lobster
traps off Cranberry Islands, he will monitor all activity in and around the traps
over a four-six month period for 24 hours a day. The camera will use a red light
source since lobsters seem less sensitive to the color red. Using time lapse
video, a couple of days of observations can be condensed into a few hours. These
tapes could help answer the question that has been plaguing lobstermen,
researchers, and marine resource managers for decades: do lost traps continue to
trap lobsters which eventually starve to death- or can the lobsters escape?
Jack Merrill and Bruce Femald, both lobster fishermen of Cranberry Islands
(Isleford), have volunteered to help with the experiment. They will assist
scientists in finding appropriate sites for the traps, change the tapes, and
check on the experiment on a day-to-day basis. A monitor on shore will show them
what' s happening down below.
Questions which could be answered by this experiment are: Can lobsters go in
and out of traps and at what frequency? Do lobsters escape from traps after a
certain time period? What happens if the trap is baited one time? If the trap
starts out empty? Do lobsters continue to enter traps after the bait is gone?
What happens to lobsters in traps when there's no food? What do lobsters who stay
inside the trap have in common? How much cannibalism is there among lobsters if
they can't escape?
Additional observations will be made on which other animals are going in and out
of traps, how bottom type (rocky, sandy, or muddy) affects activity, and day vs.
night activity. Researchers will also record the weather conditions, water
temperature, study the effects of wind and wave action on wood vs. metal traps,
and observe the decay process of wooden traps.
Data obtained from this experiment may have far-reaching results. It could
provide the kind of hard facts which legislators say they need to make an
informed decision about the proposed ghost panel bill. Some lobstermen argued
against the last regulation (which required that all traps be fitted with
biodegradable escape panels by January 1, 1988) because they said that the
technology for the panels had not been perfected. Others believe that ghost traps
are not a problem and, therefore, escape panels are an unnecessary measure.
Hopefully, this experiment will provide some solid information that will help
clear the murky waters that are clouding the ghost panel issue.
More Lobster Research on the Way (We Hope!)
Three projects, recently proposed to the University of Maine/ University of New
Hampshire Sea Grant Program, would be of great interest to the lobster
industry.
Maintaining a harvestable, legal size lobster population depends to some degree
on the survival of larvae. Therefore, Dr. Lewis Incze of the Bigelow Laboratory
for Ocean Sciences in West Boothbay plans to examine how planktonic larval
lobsters are delivered to suitable benthic (sea bottom) habitats and what factors
contribute to their survival. He will collect data in the Damariscotta-Boothbay
area over a two year period on the patterns of distribution and abundance of
larvae, and then determine whether oceanographic features (i.e. internal waves,
island tidal wakes, tidal convergences, circulation patterns, etc.) affect their
abundance. In addition, aerial surveys and at-sea sampling will be conducted to
examine the physical features of the sea surface which could contribute to larval
aggregation. Finally, observations will be made to determine how the behavior and
physiology of the larvae themselves help them settle in a desireable bottom
habitat.
Dr. Robert Steneck, marine ecologist with the University of Maine, has been
working with fishermen in the "Thread of Life" area (trap-free zone; see November
issue) studying lobster ecology and behavior. He is now proposing to examine the
impact of bottom dragging on lobster populations and the carrying capacity of
their habitats (or how many lobsters an area can support). Through his research,
Dr. Steneck will determine whether dragging kills lobsters directly or if it
destroys their shelter-sites, thereby making them more susceptible to natural
predators and other competitors. He is also planning to test his hypothesis that
the number and size of shelter-sites in a habitat determine how many lobsters can
live there and what size they are. Although these experiments have been designed
for the Damariscove-"Thread of Life" region, researchers hope to survey a range
of locations throughout the Gulf of Maine to determine the impact of dragging on
the carrying capacity of lobster habitats in different areas.
Dr. Irving Kornfield of the Zoology Department at the University of Maine will
use molecular biology techniques to determine whether offshore lobster
populations contribute to inshore production and larval recruitment.
Preliminary findings have shown that inshore lobsters in the Gulf of Maine are
not genetically different (possess distinct mitochondrial DNA's) from offshore
lobsters. However, there may be genetic differences between inshore and offshore
females as well as differences between inshore and offshore males. By expanding
this study to include an examination of variations in nuclear DNA between male
and female lobsters in inshore and offshore populations, researchers will be able
to determine whether offshore male lobsters are contributing to inshore
production through movement.
An important benefit obtained from using molecular biology techniques to study
lobster populations is that a new class of genetic markers will be identified.
These markers could be used for tagging juvenile lobsters produced in hatcheries-
to find out how many of them survive after they are released into the ocean. This
will help hatcheries evaluate more accurately the success of their programs.
The Maine Lobster Institute will be keeping an eye on these proposals and their
progress through review stages, in hopes that they will be supported by the
Maine/ New Hampshire Sea Grant Program.
V-Notch Lobster Survey TRAPS AVG. LBS. V-NOTCHED AVG. SIZE (in>) #RECAPTURED %RECAPTURED V-NOTHCED
AVG. SIZE (in.) #RECAPTURED %RECAPTURED EGGED NON- AVG. SIZE (in.) #RECAPTURED
%RECAPTURED V-NOTCHED % LOBSTERS #RECAPTURED %RECAPTURED
AVG. SIZE % EGGED #RECAPTURED %RECAPTURED 28053 0.979 3496 3.63 314 8.98% 569
3.97 29 5.10% 99 3.89 4 4.04% 3.68 14.0% 343 8.44% 3.96
85.2% 33 4.94% 7545 1.001 471 3.65 167 35.4% 180
3.77 55 30.56% 93 3.80 11 11.83% 3.68 27.6% 222 34.10% 3.78
65.9% 66 24.18% 13257 0.556 468 3.70 55 11.75% 142
4.19 15 10.56% 52 4.18 5 9.62% 3.81 23.3% 70 11.48% 4.19
73.2% 20 10.31% 25549 0.924 659 3.67 66 10.02% 192
4.28 19 9.90% 210 4.51 4 1.90% 3.81 22.6% 85 9.99% 4.40
47.8% 23 5.72% 74404 0.899 5094 3.64 602 11.82% 108.3
4.02 118 10.90% 454 4.19 24 5.29% 3.17 17.5% 720 11.66% 4.07
70.5% 142 9.24%
This table surmmarizes the results of the 1986 survey of V-notched lobsters
conducted with the assistance of the Maine Lobstermen's Association.
This information supports the previous surveys of the Maine Lobstermen's
Association which indicated the presence of large numbers of V-notched lobsters
in Maine waters. Note that an average of 70% of the egged lobsters were
V-notched. This study also showed that the average size of the V-notched lobsters
(3.71 inch carapace length) to be larger than the average landed lobster (3.47
inch carapace length).
An interesting note: On thirteen days during this study, researchers accompanied
fishermen to collect data in an effort to confirm the accuracy of the data
recorded by fishermen. Traditionally, data collected by fishermen has been viewed
with skepticism by the scientific world. However, a statistical analysis revealed
that the data recorded by fishermen was no different than that recorded by
researchers.
Welcome Aboard!
The following companies and individuals have pledged their support by becoming
members for 1988. They are the leaders in making the Institute work for the
industry. We owe them all a hearty thanks. The list of members grows each week;
make sure your company or name is on it.
A.S. Francis & Sons Lobster
Dr. Incze will conduct his studies in cooperation with Dr. Robert Steneck
(University of Maine) and Dr. Stan Cobb (University of Rhode Island).
POUNDS
per trap
no eggs
with eggs
NOTCHED
AVG. SIZE (in.)
EGGED
EGGED (in.)
V-NOTCHED Damariscotta
26197
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.S. Thomaston
8484
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.S.W. Harbor
7127
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.Jonesboro
18782
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
TOTAL
60590
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Atwood Brothers
Baileys Lobster Pound
CarverIndustries
Carver Snappy Lobster
Colwell Brothers
Conary Cove Lobster Co.
Edward
Black Seafood
Elmer Beal
Franklin Libby
Friendship Trap
Graffam Brothers
Hamilton
Marine
James Hook Co.
Keene Narrows Lobster Co.
Kelley Lobster
Co.
Lobster
Products
M&M Lobster
Maine Coast Seafood
OS&BS Look
Pauls Lobster Co.
Perio Point
Lobster
Pine Point Fishermen's Co-op
R. Brown Inc.
R. Lunt Inc.
Riverdale Mills
Corp. (Aqua-Mesh)
Seal Point Seafood
Stonington Co-op
W. Walter Anderson
Young
Brothers