Click
here for printable version of this section
Essential Habitats for Lobsters
An essay for management considerations by:
Robert S. Steneck, Ph.D.
University of Maine, School of Marine Sciences, Darling Center
Richard A. Wahle, Ph.D.
Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences
Kari L Lavalli, Ph.D.
Southwest Texas State University
14 August 1998
Growing concerns about the preservation of exploited
marine species has lead to the inclusion
of "essential habitat" considerations in recent Federal legislation
included in the Sustainable
Fisheries Act. This has caused some confusion about what essential
habitat is and how it can be
effectively managed. Essential habitats need to be, defined for each
managed species to be useful.
Without such definitions, anywhere an organism is found or could be
found might qualify as an
essential habitat. We believe that it might be useful to prioritize
the importance of specific habitats
so management actions for their protection can be applied "surgically".
Specifically we note that
specific phases during the life history of lobsters require specific
habitats and such linkages have a
disproportionately great impact on lobster populations. In our view
such habitats should be given
priority for protection and considered as "essentia1 habitats".
Below we will define our terms, articulate the logic
of our conclusion and suggest a means of
proceeding while science continues to fill gaps in our understanding
about the biology of this
species..
"Habitat" is where an organism lives. "Essential
habitats" are places that have a
disproportionately great impact on an organisms abundance during some
critical phase in their life
cycle. A "critical phase" for an organism is the period in its life
when it is most susceptible to
mortality or, for other reasons (e.g., spawning), has a disproportionately
great influence on
population size. For many marine organisms this period occurs at the
time of settlement as they
make the transition from their planktonic (floating) larval life to
bottom-dwelling life (Doherty and
Fowler 1994). The duration of this critical phase, however, can vary
and may not exist for some
species (i.e., there may be no developmental change in vulnerability
as some organisms mature,
especially very small organisms).
Some organisms require a specific habitat at a critical
phase in their life. Such habitats are
generally called "essential". The linkage between a species and a specific
habitat may functionally
control the carrying capacity of the environment for that species.
For lobsters, there is considerable
research suggesting habitats supporting broodstock lobsters and those
that serve as nursery
grounds are most essential. We hasten to add that this does not mean
that habitats where juvenile
lobsters grow are unimportant, only that we know of no studies that
show population declines (that
is lobsters die) when juvenile habitats are lost.
Broodstock habitats include spawning areas and habitats
lobsters use while their eggs develop
externally on their abdomen. Rough handling during this phase can cause
spontaneous abortion.
Broodstock lobsters are most abundant in deep water and off shore locations
especially in the
winter but their exact habitats are unknown. In some locations, gravid
females are known to migrate
to shallow water during the summer (Campbell 1986) but the generality
ofthis phenomena is not
yet known.
Lobsters select specific nursery grounds for settlement
and studies have shown that their
survivorship is greater in nursery grounds having specific architectural
characteristics (Hudon and
Lamarche, 1989; Wahle and Steneck 1991, 1992, Wahle 1992). All known
nursery grounds (i.e.,
microhabitats where post-settlement survival is high) for lobsters
contain small shelter providing
spaces. In areas around Cape Cod, vegetation root mats have been shown
to harbor newly settled
lobsters. In many regions throughout coastal New England, cobble-stones
contain the greatest
densities of newly settled lobsters (Wahle and Steneck 1991, Cobb and
Wahle 1994, Incze et al.
1997, Palma et al 1998). Newly settled lobsters remain near their settlement
site for the first several
years, rarely venturing out of the nursery habitat. They probably sustain
themselves during this
phase by feeding on plankton drifting by and through their micro-shelters
(Lavalli and Barshaw
1989) as well as benthic organisms found in the immediate vicinity
of their shelters. Recent studies
have shown that lobster settlement is largely limited to water shallower
than 20 in (Wilson and
Steneck in prep). Moreover, cobbles and boulders comprise only about
one-eighth of the shore of
the Gulf of Maine, and an even smaller fraction in deeper waters or
along shores to the south
(Kelley 1987, Wilson and Steneck in prep.). These shallow, densely
populated lobster nurseries
should be priority essential habitats for protection.
While broodstock and nursery habitats are priority
"essential habitats" for lobsters, there are
other potentially important phases for which we know too little. Because
lobsters need habitat for
spawning and nursery grounds to be safe from predators, we suggest
those refugia are the most
important "essential habitats".
We offer our thoughts to indicate how we weigh the
importance of specific habitats at specific
life history phases of lobsters. We do this fully realizing these issues
are not black and white.
Perhaps by prioritizing habitats as we have, we may give the clearest
guidance currently possible for
management action. Our collective opinion reflects the current state
of the science but it is not, and
should not be the final word.. If we follow a framework for protecting
regionally sign)ficant
habitats (Steneck 1995, Langton et al 1996), we must be prepared to
test the assumptions we have
put forward and to periodically reconsider them as prescribed in the
practice of adaptive
management
Literature Cited:
Campbell, A. 1986. Migratory movements of ovigerous lobsters, Homarus
americanus, tagged off
Grand Manan, eastern Canada. Can. J. Fish. Aquat, Sci. 43: 2197 - 2205.
Cobb, S., Wahle, R. 1994. Early life history and recruitment processes
of clawed lobsters.
Crustaceana 67: 1 - 25.
Doherty, P., and Fowler, T. 1994. An empirical test of recruitment limitation
in a coral reef fish.
1994. Science. 263: 935 - 939.
Hudon, C., Lamarche, G. 1989. Niche segregation between American lobster,
Homarus
americanus and rock crab Cancer irroratus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 52:
155 - 168.
Incze, L. S., Wahle, R. A. and Cobb, J. S. 1997. Quantitative relationships
between postlarval
production and benthic recruitment in lobsters, Homarus americanus.
Mar. Freshwater Res. 48:
729 - 743.
Kelley, J. 1987. Sedimentary environments along Maine's estuarine coastline. In: FitzGerald, D. M.,
Rosen, P. S. (eds) A treatise on glaciated coasts. Academic Press, New York, p. 151 176.
Langton, R., R. Steneck, V. Gotceitas, F. Juanes, P. Lawton. 1996 The
interface between fisheries
Research and habitat management. North American Journal of Fisheries
Management. 16: 1 - 7.
Langton, R., R. Steneck, V. Gotceitas, F. Juanes, P. Lawton. 1996. The
interface between fisheries
research and habitat management. North American Journal of Fisheries
Management. 16: 1 - 7.
Lavalli, K. L., Barshaw, D. E. 1989. Post-larval American lobsters (Homarus
americanus) living in
burrows may be suspension feeding. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 15: 255 - 264.
Palma, A. T., Wahle, R. A. and Steneck, R. S. 1998. Different early
post-settlement strategies
between American lobsters (Homarus americanus) and rock crabs (Cancer
irroratus) in the
Gulf of Maine. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Set. 162.215 - 225.
Steneck, R. S. 1995 A framework for protecting regionally sign)ficant
habitats: environmental
science considerations. Pages 147 - 152 in Proceedings Nationa1 Research
Council Symposium:
Improving the Interaction between Environmental Management and Coastal
Ocean Sciences.
National Academy Press. Washington, D. C.
Steneck, R. S., Langton, R. W., Juanes, F., Gotceitas, V. and Lawton,
P. 1997 The interface between
fisheries research and habitat management: Response to comment. North
American Journal of
Fisheries Management. 17: 596-598.
Wahle, R. A. 1992. Substratum constraints on body size and the behavioral
scope of shelter use in
the American lobster. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 159: 59 - 75.
Wah1e, R. A. and R. S. Steneck. 1991 Recruitment habitats and nursery
grounds of the American
lobster (Homarus americanus Milne Edwards): A demographic bottleneck?
Marine Ecology
Progress Series. 69: 231 243.
Wahle, R. A. and R. S. Steneck. 1992. Habitat restrictions in early
benthic life: experiments on
habitat selection and in situ predation with the American lobster.
Journal of Experimenta1 Marine
Biology and Ecology. 157: 91 - 114.